Bravo for spelling this out, but one does not need these facts to understand how preposterous the climate change agenda is. The whole business turns upon a presumed infallibility of the technological workforce, its instrumentality, processes, and procedures, not to mention the integrity of its leadership.
What planet would we have to live on to rely on these matters? Who does not understand that technology runs on square wheels? How much evidence must we consider before we realize that much of what science tells us it knows is speculation, propped up by shoddy workmanship.
Sure, the planet might be getting warmer. Also, there might be unicorns.
The minute I heard Al Gore's spiel, I called b*******. There is no way the technology establishment can measure how hot or cold the planet is, or predict what temperature it will be tomorrow.
The Earth's thermal engine is much too large and complicated for such things to be done, but folks say the words NASA and satellite as though these syllables contain magical power.
It's dumb. You see the evidence every time you're disappointed by the failure of science and engineering to cure some problem you're dealing with. The emperor has no clothes.
I don't disagree that there is a false climate change agenda as planned by the club of rome.
Unfortunately, moore is a poor reference to cite for this (or anything) and yoho has admitted being duped by moore.
moore is a shill for monsanto regarding glyphosate which almost no one is awake to realize that it's essentially a slower kill bioweapon than the vaxx death shots (and supposedly an ingredient) in them. Most people eat it daily.
A bullshit artist is a bullshit artist which means he isn't selective where he's a bullshitter or not.
People who are intellectually honest don't believe in climate change in the first place.
Plus... "People who don't believe in God will believe in anything."
-the late, great El Rushbo
Great point!
El Rushbo!
Bravo for spelling this out, but one does not need these facts to understand how preposterous the climate change agenda is. The whole business turns upon a presumed infallibility of the technological workforce, its instrumentality, processes, and procedures, not to mention the integrity of its leadership.
What planet would we have to live on to rely on these matters? Who does not understand that technology runs on square wheels? How much evidence must we consider before we realize that much of what science tells us it knows is speculation, propped up by shoddy workmanship.
Sure, the planet might be getting warmer. Also, there might be unicorns.
The minute I heard Al Gore's spiel, I called b*******. There is no way the technology establishment can measure how hot or cold the planet is, or predict what temperature it will be tomorrow.
The Earth's thermal engine is much too large and complicated for such things to be done, but folks say the words NASA and satellite as though these syllables contain magical power.
It's dumb. You see the evidence every time you're disappointed by the failure of science and engineering to cure some problem you're dealing with. The emperor has no clothes.
I love when tech fails, even though it's frustrating.
I should have included the link...and I didn't.
Gonna resend
Not my work!
Wonderful research! Thanks so much for this!!!
I don't disagree that there is a false climate change agenda as planned by the club of rome.
Unfortunately, moore is a poor reference to cite for this (or anything) and yoho has admitted being duped by moore.
moore is a shill for monsanto regarding glyphosate which almost no one is awake to realize that it's essentially a slower kill bioweapon than the vaxx death shots (and supposedly an ingredient) in them. Most people eat it daily.
A bullshit artist is a bullshit artist which means he isn't selective where he's a bullshitter or not.
I will definitely keep that in mind. Although the claims made her do seem scientific. However, I don’t wanna fall victim to Gellman’s Amnesia.