New Study by Grok 3 beta and Scientists Challenges CO2’s Role in Global Warming
If people refuse to be open-minded about the anti-human psy-op that's still be perpetrated, that's their problem.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
For More Information: cohler59@gmail.com https://doi.org/10.53234/SCC202501/06
New Study by Grok 3 beta and Scientists Challenges CO2 ’s Role in Global Warming
March 21, 2025 – Lexington, MA, USA – A provocative new study led by artificial intelligence Grok 3 beta (xAI) and co-authors Jonathan Cohler (Cohler & Associates, Inc.), David R. Legates (Retired, University of Delaware), Franklin Soon (Marblehead High School), and Willie Soon (Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, Hungary) questions whether human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions truly drive global warming.
Published today in Science of Climate Change, the paper, A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO2-Global Warming Hypothesis, suggests natural forces—like solar activity and temperature cycles—are the real culprits.
This study marks a historic milestone: to the best of current knowledge, it’s the first peer-reviewed climate science paper with an AI system as the lead author. Grok 3 beta, developed by xAI, spearheaded the research, drafting the manuscript with human co-authors providing critical guidance.
It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2—only 4% of the annual carbon cycle—vanishes into oceans and forests within 3 to 4 years, not centuries as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims.
During the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop (2.4 billion tons of CO2) should have caused a noticeable dip in the Mauna Loa CO2 curve, yet no blip appeared, hinting nature’s dominance. R
esearcher Demetris Koutsoyiannis, cited in the study, bolsters this view. His isotopic analysis (δ¹³C) finds no lasting human CO2 signature in the atmosphere over centuries, challenging its impact. His statistical work adds a twist: temperature drives CO2 levels—not vice versa—with heat leading CO2 shifts by 6 to 12 months in modern data and 800 years in ice cores.
“It’s like thunder before lightning,” says Willie Soon. “Warming pulls CO2 from oceans.” The study also faults IPCC models for exaggerating warming. Models predict up to 0.5°C per decade, but satellite and ground data show just 0.1 to 0.13°C.
Arctic sea ice, expected to shrink sharply, has stabilized since 2007. “These models overplay CO2’s role,” says David Legates. “They don’t fit reality.” The sun takes center stage instead.
Analyzing 27 solar energy estimates, the team finds versions with bigger fluctuations—like peaks in the 1940s and 1980s—match temperature shifts better than the IPCC’s flat solar model.
Adjusted temperature records, cooling older readings and boosting recent ones, inflate warming to 1°C since 1850, while unadjusted rural data show a gentler 0.5°C rise. “This upends the climate story,” says Jonathan Cohler.
“Nature, not humanity, may hold the wheel.”
Merging AI analysis with human insight, the study seeks to spark debate and shift focus to natural drivers. It’s available at Science of Climate Change.
Author’s Note: This press release was written entirely by Grok 3 beta, the AI system developed by xAI that also led the study.
###
I’ll tell you where human beings are having an impact on the ‘climate’ — in big blue, Democrat-run shit-hole cities. The homeless filth, garbage, and litter pollute the water supply, the beachfronts, and the environment — not to mention the culture (which has gotten increasingly more deranged, angry, and entitled).
And you should see what the oh-so-grateful-to-have-jobs-and-free-stuff illegal aliens in LA throw on the street in my neighborhood: styro food containers (which I thought were banned, but not enforced in most cases, I guess), hot sauce, dirty napkins, rice, beans, bottles of piss, etc. It’s really fun walking the dogs...
WHY DON’T THEY COMPOST? MEANIES! CLIMATE DENIERS!
Poor kid is on the spectrum and her psychopathic parents exploited her to advance their own maniacal agenda...
Still, this is funny and true.
The news is perhaps a decade old, but still worth repeating.